FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 001-33887
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1847269 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification number) |
|
|
|
1204 Pilgrim Road, Plymouth, Wisconsin
|
|
53073 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (920) 892-9340
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of accelerated filer,
large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 26,393,321 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding on November 12, 2008.
Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
Table Of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
78,312 |
|
|
$ |
46,407 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
19,583 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $79 and $100 |
|
|
17,666 |
|
|
|
16,371 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
18,885 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
116,896 |
|
|
|
104,382 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
11,539 |
|
|
|
17,629 |
|
Patents and licenses, net |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
Investment |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
130,702 |
|
|
$ |
124,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,521 |
|
|
$ |
7,478 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
12,606 |
|
|
|
12,114 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
4,473 |
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
17,512 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: Shares authorized: 30,000,000 shares at March 31, 2008
and September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value: Shares authorized: 200,000,000 at March 31, 2008 and September
30, 2008; shares issued: 27,339,414 and 28,200,268 at March 31, 2008 and September 30,
2008; shares outstanding: 26,963,408 and 26,383,321 at March 31, 2008 and September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
114,090 |
|
|
|
116,875 |
|
Treasury stock: 376,006 common shares at March 31, 2008 and 1,816,947 at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
(9,877 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
113,190 |
|
|
|
108,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
130,702 |
|
|
$ |
124,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
3
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
14,247 |
|
|
$ |
17,280 |
|
|
$ |
28,752 |
|
|
$ |
30,169 |
|
Service revenue |
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
18,760 |
|
|
|
35,126 |
|
|
|
34,866 |
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
11,467 |
|
|
|
18,821 |
|
|
|
20,080 |
|
Cost of service revenue |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
12,425 |
|
|
|
23,202 |
|
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
6,321 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
11,924 |
|
|
|
11,532 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
5,508 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
4,288 |
|
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
|
8,407 |
|
|
|
11,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(624 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Dividend and interest income |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock
and preferred
stock dividends |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock
in undistributed earnings |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable
to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,283,160 |
|
|
|
26,959,790 |
|
|
|
10,711,695 |
|
|
|
26,998,857 |
|
Diluted net income per share attributable
to common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Weighted-average common shares and share
equivalents outstanding |
|
|
20,394,499 |
|
|
|
29,018,991 |
|
|
|
19,782,208 |
|
|
|
29,613,684 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
4
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,801 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Other |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,345 |
) |
|
|
1,295 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(6,182 |
) |
|
|
(2,096 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(1,844 |
) |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,571 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
(6,865 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
(17,415 |
) |
Additions to patents and licenses |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
Gain on sale of long term investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
Net decrease in amount due from shareholder |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,844 |
) |
|
|
(24,855 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock into treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,138 |
) |
Proceeds from shareholder notes receivable, net |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net activity in revolving line of credit |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess benefit for deferred taxes on stock-based compensation |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Deferred financing costs and offering costs |
|
|
(2,385 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
9,554 |
|
|
|
(6,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,579 |
|
|
|
(31,905 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
78,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
6,864 |
|
|
$ |
46,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term note receivable received on sale of investment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
Shares surrendered for payment of stock note receivable |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock accretion |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
5
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Organization
The Company includes Orion Energy Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation, and all consolidated
subsidiaries. The Company is a developer, manufacturer and seller of lighting and energy management
systems. The corporate offices are located in Plymouth, Wisconsin and manufacturing and operations
facilities are located in Plymouth and Manitowoc, Wisconsin.
Initial Public Offering
In December 2007, the Company completed its initial public offering (IPO) of common stock in
which a total of 8,846,154 shares were sold, including 1,997,062 shares sold by selling
shareholders, at an issuance price of $13.00 per share. The Company raised a total of $89.0 million
in gross proceeds from the IPO, or approximately $78.6 in net proceeds after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions of $6.2 million and offering costs of approximately $4.2 million.
Concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering on December 24, 2007, all of the
Companys then outstanding Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock converted on a one
share to one share basis to common stock. The numbers of shares converted were 2,989,830 and
1,818,182 of Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock, respectively. On December 24,
2007, the holders of convertible debt converted $10.8 million of such debt and accreted interest
into 2,360,802 shares of the Companys common stock.
NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Orion Energy Systems,
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending
March 31, 2009 or other interim periods.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required
by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2008.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during that reporting period. Areas that require the use
of significant management estimates include revenue recognition, inventory obsolescence and bad
debt reserves, accruals for warranty expenses, income taxes and certain equity transactions.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
6
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term investments with original maturities of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Short-term investments available for sale
The amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities, with gross unrealized gains and
losses, as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
Short Term |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
27,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,955 |
|
|
$ |
27,955 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
9,124 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
6,183 |
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
Government agency obligations |
|
|
23,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
23,377 |
|
|
|
8,974 |
|
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,162 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
$ |
64,944 |
|
|
$ |
45,361 |
|
|
$ |
19,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash |
|
|
Short Term |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Investments |
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
14,466 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
14,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency obligations |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
80,232 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
80,233 |
|
|
$ |
77,829 |
|
|
$ |
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). In February 2008, The Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial
statements at fair value at least annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 157 with respect to its financial assets and liabilities only. SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS
No. 157 as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an
exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to
measure fair value under SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of
inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be
used to measure fair value which are the following:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active;
or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations or financial position. As of September 30, 2008, the Companys financial assets were
measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 employing level 1 inputs.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximate their
respective fair values due to the relatively short-term nature of these
7
instruments. Based upon interest rates currently available to the Company for debt with
similar terms, the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt is also approximately equal to
its fair value.
Accounts receivable
The majority of the Companys accounts receivable are due from companies in the commercial,
industrial and agricultural industries, and wholesalers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation
of a customers financial condition. Generally, collateral is not required for end users; however,
the payment of certain trade accounts receivable from wholesalers is secured by irrevocable standby
letters of credit. Accounts receivable are due within 30-60 days. Accounts receivable are stated at
the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances. The Company provides for
probable uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to an allowance for
doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current status of individual accounts. Balances
that are still outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off
through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to accounts receivable.
Included in accounts receivable are amounts due from a third party finance company to which
the Company has sold, without recourse, the future cash flows from lease arrangements entered into
with customers. Such receivables are recorded at the present value of the future cash flows
discounted at 10.25%. As of September 30, 2008, the following amounts were due from the third
party finance company in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
162 |
|
2010 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross receivable |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: amount representing interest |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net contracts receivable |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials and components, such as ballasts, metal sheet and coil
stock and molded parts; work in process inventories, such as frames and reflectors; and finished
goods, including completed fixtures or systems and accessories, such as lamps, meters and power
supplies. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value with cost determined
using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company reduces the carrying value of its
inventories for differences between the cost and estimated net realizable value, taking into
consideration usage in the preceding 12 months, expected demand, and other information indicating
obsolescence. The Company records as a charge to cost of product revenue the amount required to
reduce the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value. As of March 31, 2008 and September
30, 2008, the Company had inventory obsolescence reserves of $530,000 and $591,000.
Costs associated with the procurement and warehousing of inventories, such as inbound freight
charges and purchasing and receiving costs, are also included in cost of product revenue.
Inventories were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials and components |
|
$ |
9,948 |
|
|
$ |
9,977 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,789 |
|
|
$ |
18,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land and land improvements |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
5,302 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
Plant equipment |
|
|
4,543 |
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
7,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,223 |
|
|
|
21,702 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3,684 |
) |
|
|
(4,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
$ |
11,539 |
|
|
$ |
17,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment included above under capital leases were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Equipment |
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net equipment |
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company capitalized $57,000 and $96,000 of interest for construction in progress for the
three and six months ended September 30, 2008. There was no interest capitalized for the three and
six months ended September 30, 2007.
Patents and Licenses
In April 2008, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with the Companys CEO,
Neal Verfuerth, which superceded and terminated Mr. Verfuerths former employment agreement with
the Company. Under the former agreement, Mr. Verfuerth was entitled to initial ownership of any
intellectual work product he made or developed, subject to the Companys option to acquire, for a
fee, any such intellectual work product. The Company made payments to Mr. Verfuerth totaling
$144,000 per year in exchange for the rights to eight issued and pending patents. Pursuant to the
new employment agreement, in exchange for a lump sum payment of $950,000, Mr. Verfuerth terminated
the former agreement and irrevocably transferred ownership of his current and future intellectual
property rights to the Company as the Companys exclusive property. This amount was capitalized in
fiscal 2009 and is being amortized over the estimated future useful lives (ranging from 10 to 17
years) of the property rights.
9
Investment
In June 2008, the Company sold its long-term investment consisting of 77,000 shares of
preferred stock of a manufacturer of specialty aluminum products. The investment was originally
acquired in July 2006 by exchanging products with a fair value of $794,000. The Company received
cash proceeds from the sale in the amount of $986,000, which included accrued dividends of
$128,000, and also received a promissory note in the amount of $298,000.
Other Long-Term Assets
Other long-term assets include $62,000 and $44,000 of deferred financing costs as of March 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008 and $298,000 of a note receivable as of September 30, 2008. Upon the
sales of the long-term investment noted above, we received a promissory note. The note provides for
interest only payments at 7% for the first year and 15% for the second year and thereafter. The
full principal amount of the note is due in June 2011. The note is secured by a personal guarantee
from the CEO of the specialty aluminum products company.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses include warranty accruals, accrued wages, accrued vacations, sales tax
payable and other various unpaid expenses. Accrued subcontractor fees amounted to $916,000 as of
March 31, 2008 and accrued bonus costs amounted to $968,000 as of March 31, 2008. No accrued costs
exceeded 5% of current liabilities as of September 30, 2008.
The Company generally offers a limited warranty of one year on its products in addition to
those standard warranties offered by major original equipment component manufacturers. The
manufacturers warranties cover lamps and ballasts, which are significant components in the
Companys products.
Changes in the Companys warranty accrual were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
Provision to cost of revenue |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Charges |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104,
Revenue Recognition. Based upon SAB 104, revenue is recognized when the following four criteria are
met:
|
|
|
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; |
|
|
|
|
delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer; |
|
|
|
|
the sales price is fixed and determinable and no further obligation exists; and |
|
|
|
|
collectability is reasonably assured |
These four criteria are met for the Companys product only revenue upon delivery of the
product and title passing to the customer. At that time, the Company provides for estimated costs
that may be incurred for product warranties and sales returns. Revenues are presented net of sales
tax and other sales related taxes.
For sales contracts consisting of multiple elements of revenue, such as a combination of
product sales and services, the Company determines revenue by allocating the total contract revenue
to each element based on the relative fair values in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables.
Services other than installation and recycling that are completed prior to delivery of the
product are recognized upon shipment and
10
are included in product revenue as evidence of fair value does not exist. These services
include comprehensive site assessment, site field verification, utility incentive and government
subsidy management, engineering design, and project management.
Service revenue includes revenue earned from installation, which includes recycling services.
Service revenue is recognized when services are complete and customer acceptance has been received.
The Company primarily contracts with third-party vendors for the installation services provided to
customers and, therefore, determines fair value based upon negotiated pricing with such third-party
vendors. Recycling services provided in connection with installation entail disposal of the
customers legacy lighting fixtures.
Costs of products delivered, and services performed, that are subject to additional
performance obligations or customer acceptance are deferred and recorded in Prepaid Expenses and
Other Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These deferred costs are expensed at the
time the related revenue is recognized. Deferred costs amounted to $82,000 and $602,000 as of March
31, 2008 and September 30, 2008.
Deferred revenue relates to an obligation to provide maintenance on certain sales and is
classified as a liability on the Balance Sheet. The fair value of the maintenance is readily
determinable based upon pricing from third-party vendors. Deferred revenue is recognized when the
services are delivered, which occurs in excess of a year after the original contract.
Deferred revenue was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred revenue current liability |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
Deferred revenue long term liability |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred revenue |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
and FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109. SFAS 109 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax
consequences of temporary differences between financial reporting and income tax basis of assets
and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to be in effect when
the temporary differences will reverse. Deferred income taxes also arise from the future tax
benefits of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is established when
management determines that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset
will not be realized.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon examination. The Company has classified the amounts recorded for uncertain tax
benefits in the balance sheet as other liabilities (non-current) to the extent that payment is not
anticipated within one year. The Company recognizes penalties and interest related to uncertain tax
liabilities in income tax expense. Penalties and interest are immaterial as of the date of adoption
and are included in the unrecognized tax benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits upon adoption on March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
392 |
|
Decreases relating to settlements with tax authorities |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Additions based on tax positions related to the current
period positions |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision for the six months ended September 30, 2008 was determined by
applying an estimated annual effective tax rate of 43.98% to income before taxes. The estimated
effective income tax rate was determined by applying statutory tax rates to pretax income adjusted
for certain permanent book to tax differences and tax credits.
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income
tax rate:
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Statutory federal tax rate |
|
|
34.00 |
% |
|
|
34.00 |
% |
State taxes, net |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
Incentive stock options |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
Federal tax credit |
|
|
(1.50 |
)% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
State tax credit |
|
|
(1.00 |
)% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Other, net |
|
|
(0.30 |
)% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
38.10 |
% |
|
|
43.98 |
% |
The Company is eligible for tax benefits associated with the excess of the tax deduction
available for exercises of non-qualified stock options over the amount recorded at grant. The
amount of the benefit is based on the ultimate deduction reflected in the applicable income tax
return. The current benefit of $1.4 million was recorded as a reduction in taxes payable and a
credit to additional paid-in capital based on the amount that was utilized year to date. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company has approximately $4.8 million of net operating losses that
resulted from the exercise of non-qualified stock options in the current and prior years that have
not been recognized as a reduction to current income taxes payable.
The Company has issued incentive stock options for which stock compensation expense is not
deductible currently for tax purposes. The non-deductible expense is considered permanent in
nature. A disqualifying disposition occurs when a shareholder sells shares from an option exercise
within 12 months of the exercise date or within 24 months of the option grant date. In the event of
a disqualifying disposition, the option and related stock compensation expense take on the
characteristics of a non-qualified stock option grant, and is deductible for income tax purposes.
This deduction is a permanent tax rate differential. The Company could incur significant changes in
its effective tax rate in future periods based upon incentive stock option compensation expense and
disqualifying disposition events. As of July 30, 2008, all future stock option grants will be
issued as non-qualified stock options.
Stock Option Plans
The fair value of each option grant for the three and six months ended September 30, 2007 and
2008 was determined using the assumptions in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Weighted average expected term |
|
2.6 years |
|
6.0 years |
|
2.4 years |
|
5.7 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
Expected forfeiture rate |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and does
not consider common stock equivalents.
Prior to the Companys IPO on December 24, 2007, all series of the Companys preferred stock
participated in all undistributed earnings with the common stock. The Company allocated earnings to
the common shareholders and participating preferred shareholders under the two-class method as
required by EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method under which basic net income per share
is calculated for the Companys common stock and participating preferred stock considering both
accrued preferred stock dividends and participation rights in undistributed earnings as if all such
earnings had been distributed during the year. Since the Companys participating preferred stock
was not contractually required to share in the Companys losses, in applying the two-class method
to compute basic net income per common share, no allocation was made to the preferred stock if a
net loss existed or if an undistributed net loss resulted from reducing net income by the accrued
preferred stock dividends. All preferred stock outstanding as of the IPO was automatically
converted to common stock upon closing of the IPO.
Diluted net income per common share reflects the dilution that would have occurred if
preferred stock was converted, warrants and employee stock options were exercised, and shares
issued per exercise of stock options for which the exercise price was paid by a non-recourse loan
from the Company were outstanding. In the computation of diluted net income per common share, the
Company uses the if converted method for preferred stock and restricted stock, and the treasury
stock method for outstanding options and warrants. In addition, in computing the dilutive effect
of the convertible notes, the numerator is adjusted to add back the after-tax amount of interest
recognized in the period.
12
The net income per share of common stock for the three and six months ended September 30, 2007
and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands except share amounts) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
1,801 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Participation rights of preferred stock in undistributed earnings |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic net income per common share |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Adjustment for interest, net of income tax effect |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and participation rights of preferred stock |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,283,160 |
|
|
|
26,959,790 |
|
|
|
10,711,695 |
|
|
|
26,998,857 |
|
Weighted-average effect of preferred stock, restricted stock,
convertible notes and assumed conversion of stock options and
warrants |
|
|
9,111,339 |
|
|
|
2,059,201 |
|
|
|
9,070,513 |
|
|
|
2,614,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding |
|
|
20,394,499 |
|
|
|
29,018,991 |
|
|
|
19,782,208 |
|
|
|
29,613,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties
The Companys cash is deposited with one major financial institution. At times, deposits in
this institution exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. The Company has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that it is not exposed to any significant risk
on these balances.
The Company currently depends on one supplier for a number of components necessary for its
products, including ballasts and lamps. If the supply of these components were to be disrupted or
terminated, or if this supplier were unable to supply the quantities of components required, the
Company may have short-term difficulty in locating alternative suppliers at required volumes.
Purchases from this supplier accounted for 62.5% and 14.9% of total cost of revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 and 45.8% and 22.1% of total cost of revenue for six
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008.
For the three and six months ended September 30, 2007, one customer accounted for 19% and 20%
of revenue. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, no customers accounted for more
than 10% of revenue.
One customer accounted for 19% of accounts receivable as of March 31, 2008. As of September
30, 2008, no customer accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance.
Segment Information
The Company has determined that it operates in only one segment in accordance with SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as it does not disaggregate
profit and loss information on a segment basis for internal management reporting purposes to its
chief operating decision maker.
The Companys revenue and long-lived assets outside the United States are insignificant.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 (FSP 157-2), which delayed
the effective date by which companies must adopt the provisions of SFAS 157. FSP 157-2 defers the
effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material
impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure at fair value some
financial instruments and certain other items that are not currently required to be measured at
fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items will be required to be reported
in earnings in the current period. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements for similar type of assets and liabilities measured at fair value. SFAS 159 is
effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect to measure
13
any of our financial assets or liabilities using the fair value option of SFAS 159. The
Company will assess at each measurement date whether to use the fair value option on any future
financial assets or liabilities as permitted pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) which
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141R also provides guidance for recognizing and
measuring goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose
to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of
SFAS 141R, but does not presently anticipate that it will have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements An Amendment to ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). The objective of this statement is
to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that a
reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires reclassifying noncontrolling interests, also referred to as
minority interest, to the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet presented upon adoption.
This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has
determined that there would be no current impact of adopting SFAS 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires
companies to provide qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using
derivatives, quantitative data about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative
contracts, and details of credit-risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions. The
statement also requires companies to disclose more information about the location and amounts of
derivative instruments in financial statements; how derivatives and related hedges are accounted
for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133);
and how the hedges affect the entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is in the process of
evaluating what effect, if any, adoption of SFAS 161 may have on the consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful
Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS
142-3), which amends the factors that should be considered in
developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also
requires expanded disclosure related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. FSP FAS
142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 on its financial position
and results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 defines the order in which accounting principles that are generally
accepted should be followed. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Presented Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 133-1 Disclosures about Credit
Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This FSP is intended to
improve disclosures about credit derivatives by requiring more information about the potential
adverse effects of changes in credit risk on the financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows of the sellers of credit derivatives. It amends FAS 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives,
including credit derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments. The provisions of the FSP that amend
FAS 133 are effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008.
Because the FSP amends only the disclosure requirements for credit derivatives and certain
guarantees, the adoption of the FSP will not affect our consolidated financial results.
NOTE C RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had non-interest bearing advances of $157,000 to a
shareholder, and also held an unsecured, 1.46% note receivable due from the same shareholder in the
amount of $67,000, including interest receivable. These advances and this note were repaid on
August 2, 2007. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2007, the Company forgave $28,000
and $37,000 of shareholder advances as part of a contractual employment relationship.
14
The Company incurred fees of $24,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 paid to a
shareholder as consideration for guaranteeing notes payable and certain accounts payable. These
guarantees were released in fiscal 2008.
The Company incurred fees of $42,000 and $12,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2007
and 2008 respectively, which were for intellectual property fees paid to an executive pursuant to
an employment agreement. In April 2008, the intellectual property rights were purchased from the
executive for a cash payment of $950,000.
The Company leases, on a month-to-month basis, an aircraft owned by an entity controlled by a
former director. Amounts paid for the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 were $16,000 and
$20,000.
During the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded revenue of
$46,000 and $8,000 for products and services sold to an entity for which the Companys Chairman of
the Board was the executive chairman. During the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, the
Company purchased goods and services from the same entity in the amounts of $0 and $114,000.
During the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded revenue of $0
and $1,000 for products and services sold to an entity for which a member of the board of directors
serves as an executive vice president.
During the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, the Company recorded revenue of
$67,000 and $52,000 for products and services sold to an entity for which a member of the board of
directors serves as the chief executive officer. During the six months ended September 30, 2007 and
2008, the Company purchased goods and services from the same entity in the amounts of $106,000 and
$42,000.
NOTE D LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt as of March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Term note |
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
First mortgage note payable |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
Debenture payable |
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Lease obligations |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
5,316 |
|
|
|
4,910 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
4,473 |
|
|
$ |
4,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement
On March 18, 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) to replace
a previous agreement between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The Credit Agreement provides
for a revolving credit facility (Line of Credit) that matures on August 31, 2010. The initial
maximum aggregate amount of availability under the Line of Credit is $25.0 million. The Company has
a one-time option to increase the maximum aggregate amount of availability under the Line of Credit
to up to $50.0 million, although any advance from the Line of Credit over $25.0 million is
discretionary to Wells Fargo even if no event of default has occurred. Borrowings are limited to a
percentage of eligible trade accounts receivables and inventories, less any borrowing base reserve
that may be established from time to time. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had not drawn any
funds on the Line of Credit. Borrowings allowed under the Line of Credit as of September 30, 2008
were $18.6 million based upon available working capital, as defined.
The Company must pay a fee of 0.20% on the average daily unused amount of the Line of Credit,
fees upon the issuance of each letter of credit equal to 1.25% per annum of the principal amount
thereof, and a fee equal to 1.0% of the principal amount of the Line of Credit then in effect if
the Company terminates the Line of Credit prior to December 23, 2008.
The Credit Agreement provides that the Company has the option to select the interest rate
applicable to all or a portion of the outstanding principal balance of the Line of Credit either
(i) at a fluctuating rate per annum one percent (1.00%) below the prime rate
15
in effect from time to time, or (ii) at a fixed rate per annum determined by Wells Fargo to be
one and one quarter percent (1.25%) above LIBOR. Interest is payable on the last day of each month.
The Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien security interest in all of the Companys
accounts receivable, general intangibles and inventory, and a second lien priority in all of the
Companys equipment and fixtures and contains certain financial covenants including minimum net
income requirements and requirements that the Company maintain net worth and fixed charge coverage
ratios at prescribed levels. The Credit Agreement also contains certain restrictions on the ability
of the Company to make capital or lease expenditures over prescribed limits, incur additional
indebtedness, consolidate or merge, guarantee obligations of third parties, make loans or advances,
declare or pay any dividend or distribution on its stock, redeem or repurchase shares of its stock,
or pledge assets. As of September 30, 2008 the Company was in compliance with all covenant
provisions.
NOTE E INCOME TAXES
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had US Federal net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $4.8 million that are associated with the exercise of non-qualified stock options
that have not yet been recognized by the Company in its financial statements. The Company also has
US state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3.1 million, of which $2.1 million are
associated with the exercise of non-qualified stock options. The Company also has federal and state
tax credit carryforwards of approximately $296,000 and $472,000 as of March 31, 2008. Both the net
operating losses and tax credit carryforwards expire between 2016 and 2027.
In fiscal 2007 and prior to its IPO, the Companys past issuances and transfers of stock
caused an ownership change. When certain ownership changes occur, tax laws require that a
calculation be made to establish a limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards
created in periods prior to such ownership change. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008,
utilization of the federal loss carryforwards was limited to $3.0 million. For the fiscal year
2009, there is only $1.8 million of net operating loss carryforward remaining from periods prior to
the ownership change, however, if there were more net operating loss available from those time
periods, the Company believes that utilization of the federal loss carryforwards would again be
limited to $3.0 million.
NOTE F COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases and Purchase Commitments
The Company leases vehicles and equipment under operating leases. Rent expense under operating
leases was $199,000 and $318,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008; and
$443,000 and $581,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008. Total annual
commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as of September 30, 2008 were $1.1 million. In
addition, the Company enters into non-cancellable purchase commitments for certain inventory items
in order to secure better pricing and ensure materials on hand, as well as for capital
expenditures. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had entered into $5.2 million of purchase
commitments related to fiscal 2009, including $4.6 million related to the remaining capital
committed for construction of its technology center and manufacturing and system improvements and
$0.6 million for inventory purchases.
Litigation
In February and March 2008, three class action lawsuits were filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, several of its officers,
all members of the board of directors, and certain underwriters relating to the Companys December
2007 IPO. The plaintiffs claim to represent those persons who purchased shares of the Companys
common stock from December 18, 2007 through February 6, 2008. The plaintiffs allege, among other
things, that the defendants made misstatements and failed to disclose material information in the
Companys registration statement and prospectus. The claims allege various claims under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The complaints seek, among other relief, class certification,
unspecified damages, fees, and such other relief as the court may deem just and proper.
On August 1, 2008, the court-appointed lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 15, 2008,
the Company and the other defendants filed a brief in support of the Companys motion to dismiss
the consolidated complaint. Response and reply briefs are currently scheduled to be filed by the
end of December 2008.
The Company believes that it and the other defendants have substantial legal and factual
defenses to the claims and allegations contained in the consolidated complaint, and the Company
intends to pursue these defenses vigorously. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company
will be successful, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations. In addition, although the
Company carries insurance for these types of
16
claims, a judgment significantly in excess of the Companys insurance coverage could
materially and adversely affect the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related
to the lawsuit.
NOTE G SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Share Repurchase Program
In July 2008, the Companys board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing
the Company to repurchase in the aggregate up to a maximum of $20 million of the Companys
outstanding common stock. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had repurchased 1,440,941 shares of
common stock at a cost of $8.1 million under the program.
NOTE H STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company grants stock options and restricted stock awards under its 2003 Stock Option and
2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plans (the Plans). Under the terms of the Plans, the Company has
reserved 9,000,000 shares for issuance to key employees, consultants and directors. The options
generally vest and become exercisable ratably between one month and five years although longer
vesting periods have been used in certain circumstances. Exercisability of the options granted to
employees are contingent on the employees continued employment and non-vested options are subject
to forfeiture if employment terminates for any reason. Options under the Plans have a maximum life
of ten years. In the past, the Company has granted both incentive stock options and non-qualified
stock options. Restricted stock awards have no vesting period and have been issued to certain
non-employee directors pursuant to elections made under the non-employee director compensation
plan, which became effective upon the closing of the Companys IPO. The Plans also provide to
certain employees accelerated vesting in the event of certain changes of control of the Company. In
December 2007, upon the closing of our IPO, an additional 1,500,000 option shares were made
available for grant under our 2004 Stock and Incentive Awards Plan.
Prior to the Companys IPO, certain non-employee directors elected to receive stock awards in
lieu of cash compensation under the non-employee director compensation plan which became effective
upon the closing of the Companys IPO. The Company granted 3,738 shares from the 2004 Stock
Incentive Awards Plan to non-employee directors as compensation for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The shares were issued in August 2008 and valued at the market price as of the
grant date of $5.35 per share.
In accordance with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the following amounts of stock-based
compensation were recorded (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, compensation cost related to non-vested common stock-based
compensation amounted to $5.5 million over a remaining weighted average expected term of 6.6 years.
The following table summarizes information with respect to the Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Available for |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Grant |
|
of Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term (in years) |
|
value |
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,482 |
|
|
|
4,716 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled or expired |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
13,049 |
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
7,811 |
|
17
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, which is calculated as
the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and the fair value of the
Companys closing common stock price of $5.61 as of September 30, 2008.
A summary of the status of the Companys outstanding non-vested stock options as of September
30, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,307 |
|
Granted |
|
|
580 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(383 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,285 |
|
Prior to the Companys IPO, the Company issued warrants in connection with various stock
offerings and services rendered. The warrants granted the holder the option to purchase common
stock at specified prices for a specified period of time. No warrants were issued in fiscal 2008 or
for the six months ended September 30, 2008.
Outstanding warrants are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
578,788 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(71,580 |
) |
|
|
2.33 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
507,208 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of outstanding warrants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
2008 |
|
|
Expiration |
|
$2.25 |
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
Fiscal 2014 |
$2.30 |
|
|
430,968 |
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
$2.50 |
|
|
37,260 |
|
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
507,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in the Form 10-Q. It should also be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2008.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q about our expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, prospects, financial condition, assumptions or future events or performance are not
historical facts and are forward-looking statements as that term is defined under the Federal
securities laws. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or
phrases such as believe, anticipate, should, intend, plan, will, expects,
estimates, projects, positioned, strategy, outlook and similar words. You should read the
statements that contain these types of words carefully. Such forward-looking statements are subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from what is expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. There may be
events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over which we have no control.
Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item
1A. Risk
18
Factors in our 2008 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 and
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We urge you not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as the date of this report. We do not undertake any
obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events
or uncertainties after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
We design, manufacture and implement energy management systems consisting primarily of
high-performance, energy-efficient lighting systems, controls and related services.
We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of high intensity
fluorescent, or HIF, lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers.
We typically sell our HIF lighting systems in replacement of our customers existing high intensity
discharge, or HID, fixtures. We call this replacement process a retrofit. We frequently engage
our customers existing electrical contractor to provide installation and project management
services. We also sell our HIF lighting systems on a wholesale basis, principally to electrical
contractors and value-added resellers to sell to their own customer bases.
We have sold and installed more than 1,310,000 of our HIF lighting systems in over 4,000 facilities
from December 1, 2001 through September 30, 2008. We have sold our products to 108 Fortune 500
companies, many of which have installed our HIF lighting systems in multiple facilities. Our top
customers by revenue in fiscal 2008 included Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Kraft Foods Inc., Sherwin
Williams Co., Kroger Co., SYSCO Corp. and Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
Our fiscal year ends on March 31. We call our prior fiscal year which ended on March 31, 2008 ,
fiscal 2008. We call our current fiscal year, which will end on March 31, 2009, fiscal 2009.
Our fiscal first quarter ends on June 30, our fiscal second quarter ends on September 30, our
fiscal third quarter ends on December 31 and our fiscal fourth quarter ends on March 31.
Revenue and Expense Components
Revenue. We sell our energy management products and services directly to commercial and industrial
customers, and indirectly to end users through wholesale sales to electrical contractors and
value-added resellers. We currently generate the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of
HIF lighting systems and related services to commercial and industrial customers. While our
services include comprehensive site assessment, site field verification, utility incentive and
government subsidy management, engineering design, project management, installation and recycling
in connection with our retrofit installations, we separately recognize service revenue only for our
installation and recycling services. Except for our installation and recycling services, all other
services historically have been completed prior to product shipment and revenue from such services
was included in product revenue because evidence of fair value for these services did not exist. We
are continuing to increase our selling efforts through our contractor and value-added reseller
channels with increased marketing through mass mailings, participating in national trade
organizations and providing training to channel partners on our sales methodologies. These
wholesale channels accounted for approximately 25% of our total revenue volume in fiscal 2008 and
47% of our total revenue for the first half of fiscal 2009. The increase in wholesale revenue is
due to our marketing and training efforts within this channel, and we expect that revenue from
these channels will exceed 30% of our total revenue in fiscal 2009.
In October 2008, we introduced to the market a new financing program for our customers purchase of
our energy management systems called the Orion Virtual Power Plant (OVPP). The OVPP is structured
as a supply contract in which we commit to deliver a defined amount of energy savings at a fixed
rate over the life of the contract, typically 60 months. We collect payments from our customer on
a monthly basis across the delivery period. This program creates a revenue stream, but
may lessen near-term revenues as the payments are recognized as revenue on a monthly basis over the
life of the contract versus upfront upon product shipment or project completion. However, we do
retain the option to sell the payment stream to a third party finance company, as we have done
under the terms of our former financing program, in which case the revenue would be recognized at
the net present value of the total future payments from the finance company upon completion of the
project. The OVPP program was established to assist customers who are interested in purchasing our
energy management systems but who have capital expenditure budget limitations. In the future, we
expect an increase in the volume of sales that utilize the OVPP
financing program.
We recognize revenue on product only sales at the time of shipment. For projects consisting of
multiple elements of revenue, such as a combination of product sales and services, we separate the
project into separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values for revenue
recognition purposes. Additionally, the deferral of revenue on a delivered element may be required
if such revenue is contingent upon the delivery of the remaining undelivered elements. We recognize
revenue at the time of product shipment on product
19
sales and on services completed prior to product shipment. We recognize revenue associated with
services provided after product shipment, based on their fair value, when the services are
completed and customer acceptance has been received. When other significant obligations or
acceptance terms remain after products are delivered, revenue is recognized only after such
obligations are fulfilled or acceptance by the customer has occurred.
Our dependence on individual key customers can vary from period to period as a result of the
significant size of some of our retrofit and multi-facility roll-out projects. Our top 10 customers
accounted for approximately 53% and 38% of our total revenue for the first six months of fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2009, respectively. One customer accounted for approximately 20% of our total
revenue for the first six months of fiscal 2008. To the extent that large retrofit and roll-out
projects become a greater component of our total revenue, we may experience more customer
concentration in given periods. The loss of, or substantial reduction in sales volume to, any of
our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our total revenue in any given
period and may result in significant annual and quarterly revenue variations.
Our level of total revenue for any given period is dependent upon a number of factors, including
(i) the demand for our products and systems, including the OVPP; (ii) the number and timing of
large retrofit and multi-facility retrofit, or roll-out, projects; (iii) the level of our
wholesale sales; (iv) our ability to realize revenue from our services and our sales-type financing
programs, including whether we decide to either retain or resell the expected future cash flows
under our OVPP program and the relative timing of the resultant revenue recognition; (v) market
conditions; (vi) our execution of our sales process; (vii) our ability to compete in a highly
competitive market and our ability to respond successfully to market competition; (viii) the
selling price of our products and services; (ix) changes in capital investment levels by our
customers and prospects; and (x) customer sales cycles. As a result, our total revenue may be
subject to quarterly variations and our total revenue for any particular fiscal quarter may not be
indicative of future results.
Backlog. We define backlog as the total contractual value of all firm orders received for our
lighting products and services. Such orders must be evidenced by a signed proposal acceptance or
purchase order from the customer. Our backlog does not include national contracts that have been
negotiated, but for which we have not yet received a purchase order for the specific location. As
of September 30, 2008, we had a backlog of firm purchase orders of approximately $3.5 million. We
generally expect this level of firm purchase order backlog to be converted into revenue within the
following quarter. Principally as a result of the continued lengthening of our customers
purchasing decisions, the continued shortening of our installation cycles and the increasing number
of projects sold through national contracts, a comparison of backlog from period to period is not
necessarily meaningful and may not be indicative of actual revenue recognized in future periods.
20
Cost of Revenue. Our total cost of revenue consists of costs for: (i) raw materials, including
sheet, coiled and specialty reflective aluminum; (ii) electrical components, including ballasts,
power supplies and lamps; (iii) wages and related personnel expenses, including stock-based
compensation charges, for our fabricating, coating, assembly, logistics and project installation
service organizations; (iv) manufacturing facilities, including depreciation on our manufacturing
facilities and equipment, taxes, insurance and utilities; (v) warranty expenses; (vi) installation
and integration; and (vii) shipping and handling. Our cost of aluminum can be subject to commodity
price fluctuations, which we attempt to mitigate with forward fixed-price, minimum quantity
purchase commitments with our suppliers. We also purchase many of our electrical components through
forward purchase contracts. We buy most of our specialty reflective aluminum from a single
supplier, and most of our ballast and lamp components from a single supplier, although we believe
we could obtain sufficient quantities of these raw materials and components on a price and quality
competitive basis from other suppliers if necessary. Purchases from our current primary supplier of
ballast and lamp components constituted 22.1% of our total cost of revenue for the first six months
of fiscal 2009 and were 28% of total cost of revenue for fiscal 2008. Our production labor force is
non-union and, as a result, our production labor costs have been relatively stable. We have been
expanding our network of qualified third-party installers to realize efficiencies in the
installation process. Toward the end of fiscal 2008, we began to internalize some of our processes
performed at outside suppliers to help us better manage delivery lead time, control process quality
and inventory supply. We installed a coating line and acquired production fabrication equipment.
Each of these production items provide us with additional capacity to continue to support our
potential future revenue growth. We expect that these processes will help to reduce overall unit
costs as the equipment becomes fully utilized.
Gross Margin. Our gross profit has been and will continue to be, affected by the relative levels of
our total revenue and our total cost of revenue, and as a result, our gross profit may be subject
to quarterly variation. Our gross profit as a percentage of total revenue, or gross margin, is
affected by a number of factors, including: (i) our mix of large retrofit and multi-facility
roll-out projects with national accounts; (ii) the level of our wholesale sales (which generally
have historically resulted in higher relative gross margins, but lower relative net margins, than
our sales to direct customers); (iii) our realization rate on our billable services; (iv) our
project pricing; (v) our level of warranty claims; (vi) our level of utilization of our
manufacturing facilities and related absorption of our manufacturing overhead costs; (vii) our
level of efficiencies in our manufacturing operations; and (viii) our level of efficiencies from
our subcontracted installation service providers.
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses consist of: (i) general and administrative expenses;
(ii) sales and marketing expenses; and (iii) research and development expenses. Personnel related
costs are our largest operating expense and we expect these costs to stabilize over the remaining
half of fiscal 2009. We may choose to selectively add to our sales staff based upon opportunities
in regional markets.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and related
personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges, related to our executive, finance,
human resource, information technology and operations organizations; (ii) public company costs
including investor relations and audit (iii) occupancy expenses; (iv) professional services fees;
(v) technology related costs and amortization; and (vi) corporate-related travel.
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and related personnel
expenses, including stock-based compensation charges, related to our sales and marketing
organization; (ii) internal and external sales commissions and bonuses; (iii) travel, lodging and
other out-of-pocket expenses associated with our selling efforts; (iv) marketing programs; (v)
pre-sales costs; and (vi) other related overhead.
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs for: (i) salaries and related
personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation charges, related to our engineering
organization; (ii) payments to consultants; (iii) the design and development of new energy
management products and enhancements to our existing energy management system; (iv) quality
assurance and testing; and (v) other related overhead. We expense research and development costs as
incurred.
We have been incurring increased general and administrative expenses in connection with our being a
public company, including increased accounting, audit, investor relations, legal and support
services and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance fees and expenses. Additionally, we anticipate operating
expenses to increase at the end of fiscal 2009 based upon the completion of our new technology
center and the related building occupancy costs. We expense all pre-sale costs incurred in
connection with our sales process prior to obtaining a purchase order. These pre-sale costs may
reduce our net income in a given period prior to recognizing any corresponding revenue. We also
intend to continue to invest in our research and development of new and enhanced energy management
products and services.
21
We recognize compensation expense for the fair value of our stock option awards granted over their
related vesting period using the modified prospective method of adoption under the provisions of
the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. We recognized $1.4
million of stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2008 and $0.8 million in the first six months
of fiscal 2009. As a result of prior option grants, including option grants in fiscal 2008, we
expect to recognize an additional $5.5 million of stock-based compensation over a weighted average
period of approximately 6.6 years, including $0.7 million in the last six months of fiscal 2009.
These charges have been, and will continue to be, allocated to cost of product revenue, general and
administrative expenses, sales and marketing expenses and research and development expenses based
on the departments in which the personnel receiving such awards have primary responsibility. A
substantial majority of these charges have been, and likely will continue to be, allocated to
general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense is comprised primarily of interest expense on outstanding
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and our other long-term debt obligations described
under Liquidity and Capital Resources Indebtedness below, including the amortization of
previously incurred financing costs. We amortize deferred financing costs to interest expense over
the life of the related debt instrument, ranging from six to 15 years. We have incurred no interest
expense under our revolving credit agreement since December 2007.
Dividend and Interest Income. Our dividend income consists of dividends paid on preferred shares
that we acquired in July 2006. The terms of these preferred shares provided for annual dividend
payments to us of $0.1 million. The preferred shares were sold back to the issuer in June 2008 and
all dividends accrued were paid upon sale. We also report interest income earned on our cash and
cash equivalents. We expect our interest income to increase in fiscal 2009 as a result of our
investment of the net proceeds from our initial public offering in short-term, interest-bearing,
investment-grade securities until final application of such net proceeds.
Income Taxes. As of September 30, 2008, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$4.8 million for federal tax purposes and $3.1 million for state tax purposes. Included in these
loss carryforwards were $4.8 million for federal and $2.1 million for state tax purposes of
compensation expenses that were associated with the exercise of nonqualified stock options. The
benefit from our net operating losses created from these compensation expenses has not yet been
recognized in our financial statements and will be accounted for in our shareholders equity as a
credit to additional paid-in capital as the deduction reduces our income taxes payable. We also had
federal and state credit carryforwards of approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million,
respectively, as of March 31, 2008. These federal and state net operating losses and credit
carryforwards are available, subject to the discussion in the following paragraph, to offset future
taxable income and, if not utilized, will begin to expire in varying amounts between 2016 and 2027.
Our income before income tax in fiscal 2008 was $7.2 million. If we maintain this level of income
before income tax in future fiscal years, we would expect to utilize our federal net operating loss
carryforwards in fiscal 2009. State net operating loss carryforwards would be utilized over
approximately five fiscal years or a shorter period if our income before income taxes increases
further.
Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a companys stock, by value, over a three
year period constitutes an ownership change for federal income tax purposes. An ownership change
may limit a companys ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the
period prior to such change. In fiscal 2007 and prior to the IPO, past issuances and transfers of
our stock caused an ownership change. When certain ownership changes occur, tax laws require that a
calculation be made to establish a limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards
created in periods prior to such ownership change. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008,
utilization of the federal loss carryforwards was limited to $3.0 million. For the fiscal year
2009, there is only $1.8 million of net operating loss carryforward remaining from periods prior to
the ownership change, however, if there were more net operating loss available from those time
periods, we believe that utilization of the federal loss carryforwards would again be limited to
$3.0 million.
22
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the line items of our consolidated statements of operations on an
absolute dollar basis and as a relative percentage of our total revenue for each applicable period,
together with the relative percentage change in such line item between applicable comparable
periods set forth below (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended September 30, |
|
|
Six Months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
14,247 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
% |
|
$ |
17,280 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
$ |
28,752 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
% |
|
$ |
30,169 |
|
|
|
86.5 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Service revenue |
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(64.4 |
)% |
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
(26.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
18,760 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
35,126 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
34,866 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
9,375 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
% |
|
|
11,467 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
18,821 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
|
20,080 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Cost of service revenue |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
(64.6 |
)% |
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
3,254 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
(25.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
|
12,425 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
23,202 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
6,321 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
11,924 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
11,532 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
51.7 |
% |
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
5,508 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
Sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(15.8 |
)% |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
(10.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
(85.3 |
)% |
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(105.4 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(87.5 |
)% |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(82.7 |
)% |
Dividend and interest income |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
257.1 |
% |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
501.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
(56.6 |
)% |
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(71.8 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
(56.0 |
)% |
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
(70.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
(57.0 |
)% |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(73.0 |
)% |
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock and
preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Participation rights of preferred stock in
undistributed earnings |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
(34.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(57.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue. Product revenue increased from $14.2 million for the second quarter ended September 30,
2007 to $17.3 million for the second quarter ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $3.0 million,
or 21%. Product revenue increased from $28.8 million for the first half ended September 30, 2007 to
$30.2 million for the first half ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $1.4 million, or 5%. The
increase in product revenue was a result of increased sales of our HIF lighting systems through our
wholesale channel. Service revenue decreased from $4.2 million for the second quarter ended
September 30, 2007 to $1.5 million for the second quarter ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of
$2.7 million, or 64%. Service revenue decreased from $6.4 million for the first half ended
September 30, 2007 to $4.7 million for the first half ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.7
million, or 26%. The decrease in service revenues was a result of the increased revenues to our
wholesale channels where services are not provided. Additionally, our first half fiscal 2009
revenue was impacted by a lengthening sales cycle in the marketplace. We attribute this to general
conservatism in the marketplace concerning capital spending and purchase decisions due to adverse
economic and credit market conditions.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin. Our cost of product revenue increased from $9.4 million for the
second quarter ended September 30, 2007 to $11.4 million for the second quarter ended September 30,
2008, an increase of $2.0 million, or 22%. Our cost of product revenue increased from $18.8 million
for the first half ended September 30, 2007 to $20.1 million for the first half ended September 30,
2008, an increase of $1.3 million, or 7%. Our cost of service revenues decreased from $2.7 million
for the second quarter ended September 30, 2007 to $1.0 million for the second quarter ended
September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 65%. Total gross margin decreased from 34.3% for
the second quarter ended September 30, 2007 to 33.8% for the second quarter ended September 30,
2008 and decreased from 33.9% for the first half ended September 30, 2007 to 33.1% for the first
half ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in gross margin was attributable to unabsorbed
manufacturing capacity costs related to additions of new process capabilities added in the fiscal
2008 fourth quarter for product coating and fabrication equipment. Gross margins may increase
slightly in the near future to the extent our production volumes increase to support our planned
roll-out programs and proposal pipeline and to the extent that we reduce excess capacity in our new
manufacturing process equipment.
Operating Expenses
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses increased from $1.9 million for
the second quarter ended September 30, 2007 to $2.9 million for the second quarter ended September
30, 2008, an increase of $1.0 million, or 52%. The increase was a result of: (i) $0.4 million in
increased compensation as a result of executive employment contracts and increased compensation
costs related to hiring additional employees in our accounting, information technology and
administration departments; (ii) additional legal expenses including $0.2 million incurred for
costs related to the class action litigation ; (iii) $0.1 million for increases related to
consulting and depreciation costs for technology improvements; and (iv) $0.5 million increase for
public company costs related to audit and tax support, investor relations, compliance and SOX
initiatives that were not incurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
23
General and administrative expenses increased from $3.5 million for the first half ended September
30, 2007 to $5.5 million for the first half ended September 30, 2008 , an increase of $2.0 million,
or 58%. Total headcount increased by ten from the prior year as we added staff support in our
accounting, information technology and administrative functions resulting in increased compensation
costs. Legal expenses increased as a result of the class action litigation and public company
reporting and compliance costs. Additionally as a result of being a public company, we have
incurred increased costs for audit and tax support, SOX compliance and other public company
administrative costs. For the first half ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $0.4 million
gain on the sale of an asset in our general and administrative expenses.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses increased from $1.9 million for the second
quarter ended September 30, 2007 to $2.8 million for the second quarter ended September 30, 2008,
an increase of $0.9 million, or 44%. The increase was a result of increased employee compensation
and recruiting costs of $0.6 million and stock option compensation expenses of $0.1 million
resulting from our hiring additional sales and marketing personnel during our fiscal 2009 first
quarter. Our marketing costs increased by $0.2 million as a result of our efforts to increase our
brand awareness through direct mail campaigns into the wholesale channel and participation in
national trade shows.
Sales and marketing expenses increased from $4.0 million for the first half ended September 30,
2008 to $5.4 million for the first half ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $1.4 million, or
35%. Total headcount increased by 15 from the prior year as we added staff in our direct sales,
sales support and marketing functions which resulted in increased compensation and recruiting
costs. Sales costs increased for internal training of new sales employees and external training for
resellers. Marketing costs increased as a result of direct mail expenditures for brand awareness
and participation in national trade shows.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses decreased for the second quarter
and first half ended September 30, 2008 from the second quarter and first half ended September 30,
2007 on an absolute dollar basis and as a percentage of total revenue as a result of decreased
research consulting expenses and a reduction in sample and material costs as our wireless control
product transitioned into production stages.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense decreased for the second quarter and first half ended
September 30, 2008 from the second quarter and first half ended September 30, 2007 primarily as a
result of reduced interest expense of $0.4 million due to the payoff of our revolving line of
credit balance in December 2007. For the six months ended September 30, 2008, we capitalized
$96,000 of interest for construction in progress.
Dividend and Interest Income. Dividend and interest income increased for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2008 from the three and six months ended September 30, 2007 due to interest
income earned on the invested proceeds from our initial public offering completed in December 2007.
Income Taxes. Our income tax expense decreased for the three and six months ended September 30,
2008 from the three and six months ended September 30, 2007 due to the reduction in taxable income.
Our effective income tax rate for the six months ended September 30, 2008 was 43.98%, compared to
41.6% for the six months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in our effective tax rate was due
to a mix change in state tax rates, an increase in non-deductible stock compensation expense and a
reduction in federal tax credits due to credit phase-outs as a result of higher threshold
requirements which are based upon our most recent four year revenue average.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
On December 24, 2007, we completed our initial public offering. Net proceeds to us from the
offering were approximately $82.8 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions but before
the deduction of offering expenses). We invested the net proceeds from the IPO in money market
funds and short term government agency bonds.
We had approximately $46.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $19.6 million in short term
investments as of September 30, 2008. Our cash equivalents are invested in money market accounts
and commercial paper with maturities of less than 90 days and an average yield of 3.9%. Our
short-term investment account consists of high-grade government agency bonds and AAA rated
corporate debt with expiration dates ranging from October 2008 through May 2009 and an average
yield of 2.6%.
24
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
(371 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(4,844 |
) |
|
|
(24,855 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
9,554 |
|
|
|
(6,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,579 |
|
|
$ |
(31,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Related to Operating Activities. Cash used in operating activities primarily consists of
net income adjusted for certain non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock based
compensation expenses, income taxes and the effect of changes in working capital and other
activities.
Cash used in operating activities for the first half ended September 30, 2008 was $0.4 million and
consisted of net cash of $2.8 million used for working capital purposes partially offset by net
income adjusted for non-cash expense items of $2.4 million. Cash used for working capital consisted
of an increase of $2.1 million in inventory to provide safety stock inventories on key components,
a $0.6 million increase in prepaids due to advanced payments for income taxes and services, a $0.4
million increase in deferred costs due to incomplete projects where revenue has not yet been
recognized, a $0.5 million increase for interest receivable on short-term investments and a $0.5
million decrease in accrued expenses due to payments of accrued contractors for project services
performed. This amount was offset by a decrease in trade receivables of $1.3 million as a result of
timing of cash receipts.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first half ended September 30, 2007 was $1.9 million
and consisted of net income adjusted for non-cash expense items of $3.2 million offset by cash used
for working capital purposes of $1.3 million. Cash used for working capital purposes consisted of
an increase of $2.4 million increase in trade receivables as result of increased revenues, an increase
of $6.2 million in inventory due to purchases of raw materials to support sales order backlogs and
an increase of $1.7 million in prepaids due to advanced payments for services. These amounts were
offset by an increase of $7.6 million in accounts payable as a result of increased inventories and
services, and an increase in accrued expenses of $1.4 million due to increased service contracting
activities, increased legal costs for the public offering preparation, and an increase in sales tax
accruals resulting from the revenue increase.
Cash Flows Related to Investing Activities. For the first half ended September 30, 2008, cash used
in investing activities was $24.9 million. This included $17.4 million for short-term investments
with maturity dates ranging from 91 to 360 days, $6.9 million for capital expenditures related to
the technology center, operating software systems and processing equipment for capacity and cost
improvement measures, $1.0 million for the purchase of intellectual property rights from an
executive, offset by net proceeds from the sale of an investment of $0.9 million.
Cash used in investing activities for the first half ended September 30, 2007 was $4.8 million.
This included $3.9 million for short-term investments in government agency bonds with maturities
ranging from 91 to 125 days, $1.0 million for capital expenditures for purchases of processing
equipment for capacity and cost improvement measures and $0.1 million for the continued development
of intellectual property. Cash provided from investing activities included a $0.2 million payment
received on a shareholder advance.
Cash Flows Related to Financing Activities. For the first half ended September 30, 2008, cash flows
used in financing activities was $6.7 million. This included $8.1 million used for common share
repurchases and $0.4 million for repayment of long-term debt. Cash flows provided by financing
activities included proceeds of $1.4 million received from stock option and warrant exercises and
$0.5 million in deferred tax benefits from non-qualified stock option exercises.
Cash provided by financing activities for the first half ended September 30, 2007 was $9.6 million.
This included $10.6 million in proceeds from issuance of convertible debt, $1.3 million for
proceeds received from stock option and warrant exercises, $0.8 million received in payments of
shareholder note receivables and $0.9 million in deferred tax benefits from non-qualified stock
option exercises. These were offset by $1.7 million for repayment of the revolving line of credit
and long-term debt and $2.4 million paid in equity offering costs related to our initial public
offering.
Working Capital
25
Our net working capital as of September 30, 2008 was $92.3 million, consisting of $104.4 million in
current assets and $12.1 million in current liabilities. Our net working capital as of March 31,
2008 was $104.3 million, consisting of $116.9 million in current assets and $12.6 million in
current liabilities. We may increase our inventories of raw materials and components to the extent
our sales volumes increase in the back half of fiscal 2009, as well as to reduce our risk of
unexpected raw material or component shortages or supply interruptions and to continue to purchase
component inventory as our wireless technology moves into the production stages. We attempt to
maintain a three-month supply of on-hand inventory of purchased components and raw materials to
meet anticipated demand. Our accounts receivable and payables may increase to the extent our
revenue and inventory levels increase. We had available borrowing capacity under our revolving
credit facility in excess of $18.6 million as of September 30, 2008, based upon our revolving
credit facility borrowing base formula described below.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, our anticipated cash flows from operating
activities, our borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility and the net proceeds from
our recent initial public will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for the remainder
of fiscal 2009. Our future working capital requirements for the remainder of fiscal 2009 and
thereafter on a longer-term basis will depend on many factors, including the rate of our revenue
growth, our introduction of new products and services and enhancements to our existing energy
management system, the timing and extent of our planned expansion of our sales force and other
administrative and production personnel, the timing and extent of our planned advertising and
promotional campaign, and our research and development activities. To the extent that our cash and
cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities, borrowing capacity under our revolving
credit facility and net proceeds from our recent initial public offering and convertible
subordinated note placement are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise
additional funds through additional public or private equity or debt financings. We also may need
to raise additional funds in the event we decide to acquire product lines, businesses or
technologies. In the event additional funding is required, we may not be able to obtain the
financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Indebtedness
On March 18, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement to replace a previous agreement between us
and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The credit agreement provides for a revolving credit facility that
matures on August 31, 2010. The initial maximum aggregate amount of availability under the line of
credit is $25.0 million. We have a one-time option to increase the maximum aggregate amount of
availability under the line of credit to up to $50.0 million, although any advance from the line of
credit over $25.0 million is discretionary to Wells Fargo even if no event of default has occurred.
Borrowings are limited to a percentage of eligible trade accounts receivables and inventories, less
any borrowing base reserve that may be established from time to time. Borrowings allowed under the
line of credit as of September 30, 2008 were $18.6 million based upon available working capital as
defined. There were no amounts outstanding as of September 30, 2008.
We must pay a fee of 0.20% on the average daily unused amount of the line of credit, fees upon the
issuance of each letter of credit equal to 1.25% per annum of the principal amount thereof, and a
fee equal to 1.0% of the principal amount of the line of credit then in effect if we terminate the
line of credit prior to December 23, 2008.
We have the option to select the interest rate applicable to all or a portion of the outstanding
principal balance under the line of credit either (i) at a fluctuating rate per annum one percent
(1.00%) below the prime rate in effect from time to time, or (ii) at a fixed rate per annum
determined by Wells Fargo to be one and one quarter percent (1.25%) above LIBOR. Interest is
payable on the last day of each month, commencing March 31, 2008.
In addition to our revolving credit facility, we also have other existing long-term indebtedness
and obligations under various debt instruments and capital lease obligations, including pursuant to
a bank term note, a bank first mortgage, a debenture to a community development organization, a
federal block grant loan, two city industrial revolving loans and various capital leases and
equipment purchase notes. As of September 30, 2008, the total amount of principal outstanding on
these various obligations was $4.9 million. These obligations have varying maturity dates between
2010 and 2024 and bear interest at annual rates of between 2.0% and 16.2%. The weighted average
annual interest rate of such obligations as of September 30, 2008 was 6.0%. Based on interest rates
in effect as of September 30, 2008, we expect that our total debt service payments on such
remaining obligations for fiscal 2009, including scheduled principal, lease and interest payments,
but excluding the repayment of our revolving line of credit, will approximate $0.6 million. As of
September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all debt covenants, as amended.
26
Capital Spending
We expect to incur approximately $4.3 million in capital expenditures during the remainder of
fiscal 2009 to complete our new technology center and other improvements at our manufacturing
facility. We also plan to incur $0.3 million in capital expenditures to expand and improve our
accounting and operating information technology systems. We expect to finance the manufacturing
improvement expenditures primarily through equipment secured loans and leases, long-term debt
financing, using cash on hand or by using our available capacity under our revolving credit
facility.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table is a summary of our long-term contractual obligations as of September 30, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 |
|
Cash interest payments on debt |
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Bank debt obligations |
|
$ |
4,910 |
|
|
$ |
861 |
|
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,685 |
|
Cash interest payments on debt |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase order and cap-ex commitments (1) |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,846 |
|
|
$ |
7,218 |
|
|
$ |
3,102 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects non-cancellable purchase order commitment in the amount of $0.6 million for certain
inventory items entered into in order to secure better pricing and ensure materials on hand
and capital expenditure commitments in the amount of $4.6 million for construction of the new
technology center at our Manitowoc facility, improvements to information technology systems
and manufacturing equipment and tooling. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
Our results from operations have not been, and we do not expect them to be, materially affected by
inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our consolidated financial
statements requires us to make certain estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and our related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We re-evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to revenue recognition,
inventory valuation, the collectability of receivables, stock-based compensation, warranty reserves
and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. A
summary of our critical accounting policies is set forth in the Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates section of our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008. There
have been no material changes in any of our accounting policies since March 31, 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a complete discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, refer to Note B in the condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk was discussed in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk section contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008.
There have been no material changes to such exposures since March 31, 2008.
27
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance
as to the reliability of our published financial statements and other disclosures included in this
report. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2008 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
This quarterly report does not include a report of managements assessment regarding internal
control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Companys registered public
accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission for newly public companies.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to various claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our
business. In addition to ordinary-course litigation, we are a party to the litigation described
below.
In February and March 2008, three class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York against us, several of our officers, all members of our
board of directors, and certain underwriters from our December 2007 initial public offering. The
plaintiffs claim to represent certain persons who purchased shares of our common stock from
December 18, 2007 through February 6, 2008. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the
defendants made misstatements and failed to disclose material information in our registration
statement and prospectus for our initial public offering. The claims allege various claims under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The complaints seek, among other relief, class
certification, unspecified damages, fees, and such other relief as the court may deem just and
proper.
On August 1, 2008, the court-appointed lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 15, 2008, we and
the other defendants filed a brief in support of our motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint.
Response and reply briefs are currently scheduled to be filed by the end of December 2008.
The Company believes that it and the other defendants have substantial legal and factual defenses
to the claims and allegations contained in the consolidated complaint, and the Company intends to
pursue these defenses vigorously. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be
successful, and an adverse resolution of the lawsuit could have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations. In addition, although the Company
carries insurance for these types of claims, a judgment significantly in excess of the Companys
insurance coverage could materially and adversely affect the Companys financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows. The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential
losses, if any, related to the lawsuit.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as noted below, during the three months ended September 30, 2008 there were no material
changes to the risk factors set forth and discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2008
Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on June
27, 2008.
28
Adverse conditions in the global economy and disruption of financial markets have negatively
impacted, and could continue to negatively impact, our customers, suppliers, and our business.
Financial markets in the United States, Europe and Asia have experienced extreme disruption in
recent months, including, among other things, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades, declines in asset valuations,
inflation, reduced consumer spending, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. While
currently these conditions have not impaired our ability to finance our operations, coupled with
continued recessionary type economic conditions, such conditions have adversely affected our
customers capital budgets and purchasing decisions and, therefore, have adversely affected our
previously anticipated rate of revenue growth. Our business will continue to be adversely affected
to the extent these adverse financial market and general economic conditions continue to adversely
affect our customers purchasing decisions.
The acceptance of our Orion Virtual Power Plant product could expose us to additional customer
credit risk and impact our financial results.
Our recently introduced financing program, the Orion Virtual Power Plant (OVPP), is an installment
based payment plan for our customers in contrast to our traditional cash terms. This new program
may subject us to additional credit risk as we do not have a long history or experience,
specifically related to longer term credit decision making. Poor credit decisions or customer
defaults could result in increases to our allowance for doubtful accounts and/or write-offs of
accounts receivable and could have material adverse effects on our results of operations and
financial condition. We do retain the option to sell completed projects into the secondary market
and recognize substantially all of the project revenue at the time of sale. We also may choose not
to sell completed OVPP programs to third parties, which would have the impact of decreasing our
near-term revenue and creating variability in our operating results both on a quarterly and annual
basis.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None
(b) Use of Proceeds
Our IPO was declared effective by the SEC on December 18, 2007. The net offering proceeds received
by us, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses incurred in connection
with the offering, were approximately $78.6 million. Through September 30, 2008, approximately
$12.7 million of the proceeds from our IPO have been used to fund operations of our business and
for general corporate purposes, including $8.1 million used for the repurchase of common shares.
The remainder of the net proceeds from the IPO are invested in short-term investment grade
securities, commercial paper and money market accounts. Other than for our share repurchases, there
has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO as described in our final
prospectus filed with the SEC on December 18, 2007 pursuant to Rule 424(b).
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders was held on September 10, 2008. Proxies with regard to the
matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting were solicited under Regulation 14A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Set forth below is a brief description of each matter voted upon
at the annual meeting and the results of voting on each such matter.
|
(I) |
|
The election of two Class I directors named below to serve until the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. There was no solicitation in opposition to the nominees listed
in the proxy statement, and the nominees were elected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Thomas A. Quadracci |
|
|
23,094,106 |
|
|
|
358,716 |
|
Michael J. Potts |
|
|
23,079,680 |
|
|
|
373,142 |
|
29
|
(II) |
|
The election of one Class II director named below to serve until the 2009 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. There was no solicitation in opposition to the nominee listed
in the proxy statement, and the nominee was elected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Russell M. Flaum |
|
|
23,058,940 |
|
|
|
393,882 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Statistical Data
The following table presents certain statistical data, cumulative from December 1, 2001 through
September 30, 2008, regarding sales of our HIF lighting systems, total units sold (including HIF
lighting systems), customer kilowatt demand reduction, customer kilowatt hours saved, customer
electricity costs saved, indirect carbon dioxide emission reductions from customers energy
savings, and square footage we have retrofitted. The assumptions behind our calculations are
described in the footnotes to the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative From |
|
|
December 1, 2001 |
|
|
Through September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(in thousands, unaudited) |
HIF lighting systems sold(1) |
|
|
1,310 |
|
Total units sold (including HIF lighting systems) |
|
|
1,684 |
|
Customer kilowatt demand reduction(2) |
|
|
387 |
|
Customer kilowatt hours saved(2)(3) |
|
|
5,915,123 |
|
Customer electricity costs saved(4) |
|
$ |
455,465 |
|
Indirect carbon dioxide emission reductions from customers energy savings (tons)(5) |
|
|
4,031 |
|
Square footage retrofitted(6) |
|
|
670,099 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HIF lighting systems includes all HIF units sold under the brand name Compact Modular and
its predecessor, Illuminator. |
|
(2) |
|
A substantial majority of our HIF lighting systems, which generally operate at approximately
224 watts per six-lamp fixture, are installed in replacement of HID fixtures, which generally
operate at approximately 465 watts per fixture in commercial and industrial applications. We
calculate that each six-lamp HIF lighting system we install in replacement of an HID fixture
generally reduces electricity consumption by approximately 241 watts (the difference between
465 watts and 224 watts). In retrofit projects where we replace fixtures other than HID
fixtures, or where we replace fixtures with products other than our HIF lighting systems
(which other products generally consist of products with lamps similar to those used in our
HIF systems, but with varying frames, ballasts or power packs), we generally achieve similar
wattage reductions (based on an analysis of the operating wattages of each of our fixtures
compared to the operating wattage of the fixtures they typically replace). We calculate the
amount of kilowatt demand reduction by multiplying (i) 0.241 kilowatts per six-lamp equivalent
unit we install by (ii) the number of units we have installed in the period presented,
including products other than our HIF lighting systems (or a total of approximately 1.68
million units). |
|
(3) |
|
We calculate the number of kilowatt hours saved on a cumulative basis by assuming the
reduction of 0.241 kilowatts of electricity consumption per six-lamp equivalent unit we
install and assuming that each such unit has averaged 7,500 annual operating hours since its
installation. |
|
(4) |
|
We calculate our customers electricity costs saved by multiplying the cumulative total
customer kilowatt hours saved indicated in the table by $0.077 per kilowatt hour. The national
average rate for 2006, which is the most current full year for which this information is
available, was $0.089 per kilowatt hour according to the United States Energy Information
Administration. (Still valid) |
|
(5) |
|
We calculate this figure by multiplying (i) the estimated amount of carbon dioxide emissions
that result from the generation of one kilowatt hour of electricity (determined using the
Emissions and Generation Resource Integration Database, or EGrid, prepared by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency), by (ii) the number of customer kilowatt hours saved
as indicated in the table. The calculation of indirect carbon dioxide emissions reductions
reflects the most recent Environmental Protection Agency eGrid data. Using the prior eGrid
data as reported in our 10-K, cumulative indirect carbon emission reductions |
30
|
|
|
|
|
from customers energy savings from December 1, 2001 through September 30, 2008 would have
equaled 5,766,653 tons. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on 1.684 million total units sold, which contain a total of approximately 8.4 million
lamps. Each lamp illuminates approximately 75 square feet. The majority of our installed
fixtures contain six lamps and typically illuminate approximately 450 square feet. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November
14, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Registrant
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Scott R. Jensen
|
|
|
|
Scott R. Jensen |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
32
Exhibit Index to Form 10-Q for the Period Ended September 30, 2008
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Orion Energy Systems, Inc. pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
33
EX-31.1
Exhibit 31.1
Certification
I, Neal R. Verfuerth, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b. |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
c. |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a. |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b. |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: November 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neal R. Verfuerth
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
1
EX-31.2
Exhibit 31.2
Certification
I, Scott R. Jensen, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for Orion Energy Systems, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a. |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b. |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
c. |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a. |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b. |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: November 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott R. Jensen
|
|
|
Scott R. Jensen |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
1
EX-32.1
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orion Energy Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neal R. Verfuerth, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neal R. Verfuerth |
|
|
|
|
|
Neal R. Verfuerth |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EX-32.2
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of CFO Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orion Energy Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott R. Jensen, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott R. Jensen |
|
|
|
|
|
Scott R. Jensen |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.